I'm attempting to provide constructive criticism, however that can be difficult. I'll be honest...

This was shallow, weak and poorly written. It reads like you have gained your information from a gossip column, rather than having conducted some basic, fundamental research.

Facts were rare, and no references were noted. Using general statements such as "considered by some ..." is not fact.

Summing up a person's 'villainy' in three or four sentences is just not possible. Genuine researchers have spent their careers/lives studying history of people such as those you've featured.

Simply poorly paraphrasing someone else's dodgy article is not research.

If it was possible, I'd invoice you for wasting my valuable time.

If you are on medium to practise your writing, please put in more effort into your research. Often, an hour of writing comes after dozens or even hundreds of hours of work. Some investigative journalists spend months on their work, to produce a single article. I imagine that you spent more time downloading the ten photos than doing any research (how did you get Guevara's permission to use the photo?)

Best of luck with producing better content..